Forest ecosystem services and local communities neighboring Biha Resort in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, Southern Sumatra, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ANGGI MARDIYANTO
RIYANTO
CORINTHIAS P. M. SIANIPAR
SHOZO SHIBATA

Abstract

Abstract. Mardiyanto A, Riyanto, Sianipar CPM, Shibata S. 2024. Forest ecosystem services and local communities neighboring Biha Resort in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, Southern Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian J For 8: 24-36. The Biha Resort in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, Indonesia, provides essential resources for biodiversity conservation and local livelihoods. However, spatial borders between surrounding villages and the resort are improperly mapped, resulting in border disputes and unmonitored exploitation of forest ecosystem services. In this study, spatial mapping of villages home to forest local communities in the resort’s buffer area was conducted via face-to-face interviews with key informants and Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with several key informants were conducted to clarify the type and locations of forest ecosystem services utilized by the local community and related harvesting schedules, and the results were analyzed thematically. The study found that local communities were distributed among eight villages, with national park land, protected forest land, limited-production forest land and customary forest land providing ecosystem resources. Villagers reported usage for water, food, pets, construction materials, fuel, medicine, raw commercial materials and other items. These services fulfill basic needs and provide a crucial source of income, underlining their critical role in sustaining rural livelihoods. The study highlights interaction between people and diverse forest ecosystems, each with unique ecological characteristics and resource offerings, and consequentially, presents distinct implications for local-community livelihood strategies. The results are expected to support forest management toward a win-win balance between conservation and local-community wellbeing.

2017-01-01

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Amacher GS, Cruz W, Grebner D, Hyde WF. 1998. Environmental motivations for migration: Population pressure, poverty, and deforestation in the Philippines. Land Econ 74 (1): 92-101. DOI: 10.2307/3147215.
Arimbi A, Ardiantiono, Rahman F, Wandono H, Muslich M, Surya RA, Widyastuti S, Sugiharti T, Anggoro VA. 2021. Menyingkap Kelola 17 Resor. Balai Besar Taman Nasional Bukit Barisan Selatan, Tanggamus, Lampung, Indonesia. [Indonesian]
Bariyah N. 2020. Developing a model of employment creation in border region?: Gaharu cultivation and honey bee farming in Bengkayang, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21 (11): 5237-5247. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d211127.
Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3: 37-41. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Brown G, Fagerholm N. 2015. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services?: A review and evaluation. Ecosyst Serv 13: 119-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park Bureau. 2019. Revisi Zona Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Bukit Barisan Selatan. Balai Besar Taman Nasional Bukit Barisan Selatan, Tanggamus. [Indonesian]
Chaigneau T, Brown K, Coulthard S, Daw TM, Szaboova L. 2019. Money, use and experience: Identifying the mechanisms through which ecosystem services contribute to wellbeing in coastal Kenya and Mozambique. Ecosyst Serv 38: 100957. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100957.
Chao S. 2012. Forest Peoples: Numbers Across World. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK.
Cuni-Sanchez A, Imani G, Bulonvu F, Batumike R, Baruka G, Burgess ND, Klein JA, Marchant R. 2019. Social perceptions of forest ecosystem services in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Hum Ecol 47 (6): 839-853. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-019-00115-6.
Damastuti, E, de Groot R. 2019. Participatory ecosystem service mapping to enhance community-based mangrove rehabilitation and management in Demak, Indonesia. Reg Environ Change 19 (1): 65-78. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-018-1378-7.
Doyle L, McCabe C, Keogh B, Brady A, McCann M. 2020. An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. J Res Nurs 25 (5): 443-455. DOI: 10.1177/1744987119880234.
Großmann K. 2017. Gaharu King–Family Queen: Material gendered political ecology of the eaglewood boom in Kalimantan, Indonesia. J Peasant Stud 44 (6): 1277-1294. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1341408.
Hauck J, Görg C, Varjopuro R, Ratamäki O, Maes J, Wittmer H, Jax K. 2013. Maps have an air of authority: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosyst Serv 4: 25-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.003.
Hettiarachchi CJ, Priyankara P, Morimoto T, Murayama Y. 2022. Participatory GIS-Based approach for the demarcation of village boundaries and their utility: A Case study of the eastern boundary of Wilpattu National Park, Sri Lanka. ISPRS Intl J Geo-Inf 11 (1): 17. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi11010017.
Hong NT, Saizen I. 2019. Forest ecosystem services and local communities: Towards a possible solution to reduce forest dependence in Bach Ma National Park, Vietnam. Hum Ecol 47 (3): 465-476. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-019-00083-x.
Iqbal MH. 2020. Valuing ecosystem services of Sundarbans Mangrove forest: Approach of choice experiment. Glob Ecol Conserv 24. DOI: e01273. 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01273.
IUCN. 2011. Sumatran Elephant. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/199856/9129626.
IUCN. 2015. Southern Red Muntjac. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/42190/56005589.
IUCN. 2018a. Aquilaria malaccensis. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/32056/2810130.
IUCN. 2020d. Lesser Green Leafbird. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22704953/177137817.
IUCN. 2020f. Rhinoceros Hornbill. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22682450/184960407.
IUCN. 2020g. Sumatran Rhinoceros. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/6553/18493355.
Kamarudin K, Titawael R, Gawariah G. 2022. Contribution of gaharu (Aquilaria sp) to community income in Fatmite Village, Namrole District, South Buru Regency. Jurnal Agrohut 12 (1): 23-30. DOI: 10.51135/agh.v12i1.136.
Kaplowitz MD, Hoehn JP. 2001. Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? Ecol Econ 36 (2): 237-247. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3.
Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. 2016. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies?: A systematic review. Res Nurs Health 40 (1): 23-42. DOI: 10.1002/nur.21768.
Lynagh FM, Urich PB. 2002. A critical review of buffer zone theory and practice: A Philippine case study. Soc Nat Resour 15 (2): 129-145. DOI: 10.1080/089419202753403319.
Muhamad D, Okubo S, Harashina K, Gunawan B, Takeuchi K. 2014. Living close to forests enhances people? s perception of ecosystem services in a forest–agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia. Ecosyst Serv 8: 197-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.003.
Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C. 2013. National parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosyst Serv 4: 104-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001.
Paudyal K, Baral H, Burkhard B, Bhandari SP, Keenan RJ. 2015. Participatory assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: Case study of community-managed forests in Central Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 13: 81-92. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.007.
Poffenberger M. 2006. People in the forest: Community forestry experiences from Southeast Asia. Intl J Environ Sustain Dev 5 (1): 57-69. DOI: 10.1504/IJESD.2006.008683.
Reed J, van Vianen J, Foli S, Clendenning J, Yang K, MacDonald M, Petrokofsky G, Padoch C, Sunderland T. 2017. Trees for life: The ecosystem service contribution of trees to food production and livelihoods in the tropics. For Policy Econ 84: 62-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.012.
Riggs RA, Sayer J, Margules C, Boedhihartono AK, Langston JD, Sutanto H. 2016. Forest tenure and conflict in Indonesia: Contested rights in Rempek Village, Lombok. Land Use Policy 57: 241-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.002.
Sandelowski M. 2000. Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23 (4): 334-340. DOI: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.
Setiawan E, Sukesi K, Hidayat K, Yuliati Y. 2021. Conservation of natural resource management in the buffer village community of Alas Purwo Banyuwangi National Park East Java Indonesia based on local wisdom. Local Wisdom Sci Online J 13 (1): 100-111. DOI: 10.26905/lw.v13i1.5109.
Suporahardjo, Wodicka S. 2003. Conflicts over community-based ‘Repong’ resource management in Pesisir Krui Region, Lampung Province, Indonesia in: Natural resource conflict management case studies: An analysis of power, participation and protected areas. https://www.fao.org/3/y4503e/y4503e04.pdf.
van der Muur W. 2018. Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing indigenous land rights in Indonesia. Citizensh Stud 1025: 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495.
van Oort B, Bhatta LD, Baral H, Rai RK, Dhakal M, Rucevska I, Adhikari R. 2015. Assessing community values to support mapping of ecosystem services in the Koshi river basin, Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 13: 70-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.004.
Willemen L, Drakou EG, Dunbar MB, Mayaux P, Egoh BN. 2013. Safeguarding ecosystem services and livelihoods: Understanding the impact of conservation strategies on benefit flows to society. Ecosyst Serv 4: 95-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.004.
Wiratno DI, Syarifudin A, Kartikasari A. 2004. Berkaca di Cermin Retak. Refleksi Konservasi Dan Implikasi Bagi Pengelolaan Taman Nasional. The Gibbon Foundation Indonesia, PILI-NGO Movement, Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Yanti UN, Sumping A, Dandri M, Dona A, Secong TT, Sirhi S, Setiawan B. 2020. Pemanfaatan daun gaharu sebagai pengobatan secara alami penyakit kanker dan hipertensi. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Khatulistiwa 3 (2): 88-93. DOI: 10.31932/jpmk.v3i2.885. [Indonesian]