The market of forest payments for environmental services in Vietnam after fifteen years of its implementation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Issue
Section
Articles
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Pham TL, Mai TTX, Ngo T. 2025. The market of forest payments for environmental services in Vietnam after fifteen years of its implementation. Asian J For 9: 75-81. Sustainable development is a core concern for most countries and entities across the globe despite the fact that there is a trade-off between environmental sustainability and economic growth. Many countries are focusing on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as SDG11: Sustainable cities and communities, SDG14: Life below water, and SDG15: Life on land. Meanwhile, the people still face challenges like unemployment and poverty, worsened by the recent pandemic. Innovative tools like Payments for Environmental Services (PES) have gained importance, and Vietnam was the first ASEAN country to implement forest PES (FPES) in 2008. Over the past 15 years, despite its achievements, such as raising individual income and government budget generation, some challenges still persist, including administrative inefficiencies and market inequalities. This study re-examined the development of Vietnam's FPES market, highlighting its contributions to the national and provincial budgets, forest protection, and cash income for forest owners. Importantly, the study also analyzed the society's awareness and knowledge of the FPES market, particularly in terms of market participants and price mechanism. We found that ongoing improvements in official training and education, as well as market mechanisms, are needed to enhance public awareness and participation in the FPES market. The integration of poverty alleviation and (forest) environmental protection in Vietnam is a collective responsibility, and this study aims to engage the audience in this crucial task.
2017-01-01
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Barrett, C. B., & Arcese, P. (1995). Are Integrated Conservation-Development Projects (ICDPs) Sustainable? On the conservation of large mammals in sub-Saharan Africa. World development, 23(7), 1073-1084. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00031-7
Blundo-Canto, G., Bax, V., Quintero, M., et al. (2018). The different dimensions of livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services (PES) schemes: A systematic review. Ecological Economics, 149, 160-183.
Brimont, L., & Karsenty, A. (2015). Between incentives and coercion: the thwarted implementation of PES schemes in Madagascar? s dense forests. Ecosystem Services, 14, 113-121.
Chu, L., Quentin Grafton, R., & Keenan, R. (2019). Increasing Conservation Efficiency While Maintaining Distributive Goals With the Payment for Environmental Services. Ecological Economics, 156, 202-210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.003
Cochard, R., Nguyen, V. H. T., Ngo, D. T., & Kull, C. A. (2020). Vietnam’s forest cover changes 2005–2016: Veering from transition to (yet more) transaction? World development, 135, 105051. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105051
Dang, H.-A. H., Nguyen, C. V., & Carletto, C. (2023). Did a successful fight against COVID-19 come at a cost? Impacts of the pandemic on employment outcomes in Vietnam. World development, 161, 106129.
Do, T. H., Patton, I., & Catacutan, D. (2022). Towards pro-poor and voluntary PES: assessment of willingness to pay and willingness to accept PES contract in central Vietnam. Journal of Land Use Science, 17(1), 505-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2022.2127953
Gallemore, C., Pham, T. T., Hamilton, M., & Munroe, D. K. (2024). Vietnam's Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services scheme's puzzling role in protecting longstanding forests as deforestation rates rise. Ecological Economics, 217, 108078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108078
GSO. (2024). Vietnam Statistical Yearbook 2023. General Statistics Office (GSO): Hanoi.
Loft, L., Gehrig, S., Le, D. N., & Rommel, J. (2019). Effectiveness and equity of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Real-effort experiments with Vietnamese land users. Land Use Policy, 86, 218-228.
Loft, L., Le, D. N., Pham, T. T., et al. (2017). Whose Equity Matters? National to Local Equity Perceptions in Vietnam's Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services Scheme. Ecological Economics, 135, 164-175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.016
Mahanty, S., Suich, H., & Tacconi, L. (2013). Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: Lessons from seven PES schemes. Land Use Policy, 31, 38-47.
Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of economics (9 ed.). Cengage Learning: Ohio, US.
MARD. (2010). Design of a REDD Compliant Benefit Distribution System for Viet Nam. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) & UN-REDD Programme: Hanoi, Vietnam.
Mardani, A., Streimikiene, D., Cavallaro, F., Loganathan, N., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2019). Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: A systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017. Science of The Total Environment, 649, 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.229
McElwee, P., Huber, B., & Nguy?n, T. H. V. (2020). Hybrid Outcomes of Payments for Ecosystem Services Policies in Vietnam: Between Theory and Practice. Development and Change, 51(1), 253-280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12548
McElwee, P. D. (2016). Forests are gold: Trees, people, and environmental rule in Vietnam. University of Washington Press.
Mercer, D. E., Cooley, D., & Hamilton, K. (2011). Taking Stock: Payments for Forest Ecosystem Services in the United States. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA): New York, NY.
Michel, J., Kallweit, K., & von Pfeil, E. (2016). Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES). In L. Pancel & M. Köhl (Eds.), Tropical Forestry Handbook (pp. 3039-3056). Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3_233
Muradian, R., Arsel, M., Pellegrini, L., et al. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters, 6(4), 274-279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
Muradian, R., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2013). The Institutional Dimension of “Market-Based Instruments” for Governing Ecosystem Services: Introduction to the Special Issue. Society & Natural Resources, 26(10), 1113-1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013.829380
Ngo, T., Tsui, W. H. K., & Nguyen, H. (2024). Aviation Pollution, Tourism, and Economic Development: A Study of the EKC Hypothesis at the Regional Level. Economy of Regions, 20(3), 718-731. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-3-8
Nguyen-Anh, T., Leu, S., Nguyen-Thi-Phuong, A., Ngo, T., & To-The, N. (2023). Adapting to the new normal: A sustainable livelihood framework for the informal sectors during COVID-19. Review of Development Economics, 27(2), 1092-1112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12974
Nguyen, M. D., Do, T. L., Do, T. T. H., et al. (2024). Effect of payment for forest ecosystem services on forest conservation practices in Vietnam. International Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(5), 5254. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i5.5254
Nguyen, V. T. H., McElwee, P., Le, H. T. V., Nghiem, T., & Vu, H. T. D. (2022). The challenges of collective PES: Insights from three community-based models in Vietnam. Ecosystem Services, 56, 101438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101438
Pagiola, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 712-724.
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (2005). Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America. World development, 33(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011
Pascual, U., Phelps, J., Garmendia, E., et al. (2014). Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services. BioScience, 64(11), 1027-1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146
Pattanayak, S. K., Wunder, S., & Ferraro, P. J. (2010). Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2), 254-274. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req006
Pham, T. T., Bennett, K., Vu, T. P., et al. (2013). Payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam: from policy to practice. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Jakarta, Indonesia.
Raes, L., Speelman, S., & Aguirre, N. (2017). Farmers’ preferences for PES contracts to adopt silvopastoral systems in southern Ecuador, revealed through a choice experiment. Environmental Management, 60, 200-215.
Rico García-Amado, L., Ruiz Pérez, M., & Barrasa García, S. (2013). Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics, 89, 92-100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.002
Rivas, A. A. F., Kahn, J. R., Freitas, C. E., Hurd, L. E., & Cooper, G. (2013). The Role of Payments for Ecological Services in the Sustainable Development and Environmental Preservation of the Rainforest: A Case Study of Barcelos, Amazonas, BR. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 4(3), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2013070102
Samii, C., Lisiecki, M., Kulkarni, P., et al. (2014). Effects of payment for environmental services (PES) on deforestation and poverty in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-95.
Sangha, K. K., Ahammad, R., Russell-Smith, J., & Costanza, R. (2024). Payments for Ecosystem Services opportunities for emerging Nature-based Solutions: Integrating Indigenous perspectives from Australia. Ecosystem Services, 66, 101600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101600
Siry, J. P., Cubbage, F. W., & Ahmed, M. R. (2005). Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 551-561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.003
Sridhar, A., Balakrishnan, A., Jacob, M. M., Sillanpää, M., & Dayanandan, N. (2023). Global impact of COVID-19 on agriculture: role of sustainable agriculture and digital farming. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 42509-42525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19358-w
Stern, D. I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World development, 32(8), 1419-1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
Tacconi, L. (2012). Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 73, 29-36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
To, P., & Dressler, W. (2019). Rethinking ‘Success’: The politics of payment for forest ecosystem services in Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 81, 582-593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.010
To, P. X., Mahanty, S., & Dressler, W. H. (2015). ‘A new landlord’(??a ch? m?i)? Community, land conflict and State Forest Companies (SFCs) in Vietnam. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 21-28.
United Nations. (2024). Global Sustainable Development Report 2023. United Nations Publication: New York, NY.
Van Hecken, G., & Bastiaensen, J. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(8), 785-792.
Vietnamese Government. (2010). Decree No. 99/2010/ND-CP on the policy on payment for forest environment services. Retrieved from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/vie100744.pdf
VNFF. (2014). Brief report of three years implementing the FPES in Vietnam. Vietnam Forest Protection and Development Fund (VNFF): Hanoi, Vietnam.
VNFF. (2024). Introduction VNFF. Retrieved from http://vnff.vn/about-vnff/general
Vu, A. D., Vo-Thanh, T., Nguyen, T. T. M., Bui, H. L., & Pham, T. N. (2024). Tourism social sustainability in remote communities in Vietnam: Tourists’ behaviors and their drivers. Heliyon, 10(1), e23619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23619
Wong, G. Y., Karambiri, M., Thu Thuy, P., et al. (2024). When Policies Problematize the Local: Social-Environmental Justice and Forest Policies in Burkina Faso and Vietnam. Forest and Society, 8(1), 296-313. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i1.34276
Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Jakarta, Indonesia.
Wunder, S. (2006). Are Direct Payments for Environmental Services Spelling Doom for Sustainable Forest Management in the Tropics? Ecology and Society, 11(2).
Wunder, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and development economics, 13(3), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X08004282
Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117, 234-243.
Wunder, S., Börner, J., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Feder, S., & Pagiola, S. (2020). Payments for environmental services: Past performance and pending potentials. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 209-234.