Comparative micromorphology of Costus pictus and Hellenia speciosa collected from Vietnam

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Thanh Triet Nguyen
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6710-2448
Van Chen Tran
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1430-231X
Nguyen Xuan Lam Duong
Thi Thu Hien Nguyen
Thi Nga Nguyen
Thi Thuy Quynh Tran

Abstract

Abstract. Triet NT, Chen TV, Lam DNX, Hien NTT, Nga NT, Quynh TTT. 2025. Comparative micromorphology of Costus pictus and Hellenia speciosa collected from Vietnam. Biodiversitas 26: 407-417. Costus pictus and Hellenia speciosa are two herbs belonging to the family Costaceae that have been used in traditional medicine to treat diabetes and are also used as daily food. The comparative anatomical characteristics between C. pictus and H. speciosa from Vietnam have not been systematically noted. This study aimed to develop microanatomical monographs of C. pictus and H. speciosa from Vietnam. Six fresh plants each were randomly collected for use in this study. Anatomical structures of rhizomes, roots, stems, and leaves were carried out using the iodine green-carmine staining method. The anatomical structural features of plant parts were analyzed and recorded through optical microscopy. The anatomical structural features of the tested samples are similar to those of Costus species. Notably, the anatomical structure of H. speciosa rhizome is similar to its stem, but different from that of C. pictus rhizome. The microstructures of their roots and leaves easily distinguish these species from each other. Additionally, smaller unicellular trichomes were observed in C. pictus leaves, while sub-air cavities, larger unicellular stout trichomes, and peltate glandular trichomes were found in H. speciosa leaves. The present evidence highlights the main structural features for distinguishing and identifying Vietnamese C. pictus and H. speciosa.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Alamgir ANM. 2017. Pharmacognostical Botany: Classification of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (MAPs), Botanical Taxonomy, Morphology, and Anatomy of Drug Plants. In: Therapeutic Use of Medicinal Plants and Their Extracts. Progress in Drug Research. Springer, Cham 1 (73): 177-293. DOI: 10.100­7/978-3-319-63862-1_6.
Anu S, Navas M, Dan M. 2020. Morpho-anatomical characterisation of the rhizomes of ten species of Curcuma L.(Zingiberaceae) from South India. J Spices Aromat Crops 29 (1): 38-47. DOI: 10.25081/josac.2020.v29.i1.6243.
Aruna A, Nandhini SR, Karthikeyan V, Bose P, Vijayalakshmi K, Jegadeesh S. 2014. Insulin plant (Costus pictus) leaves: Pharmacognostical standardization and phytochemical eval__uation. Am J Pharm Health Res 2 (8): 106-119.
Azhagu Madhavan S, Ganesan S, Sripriya R, Priyadharshini R. A Literature Review of AntiDiabetic Medicinal Plant Properties (Costus species). 2021. J Biomed Res Environ Sci 2 (5): 305-310. DOI: 10.37871/jbres1231.
Bharathi JK, Prakash MAS. 2024. Phytochemical screening and quantitative analysis, FTIR and GC-MS analysis of Costus pictus D. Don ex Lindl. Leaf extracts–A potential therapeutic herb. J Indian Chem Soc 101 (11): 101362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jics.2024.101362.
Böhmová A, Leong-Škorni?ková J, Šída O, Poulsen AD, Newman MF, Fér T. 2023. Next-generation sequencing data show rapid radiation and several long-distance dispersal events in early Costaceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 179: 107664. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107664.
Chen J, Zeng S, Zeng L, Nguyen KS, Yan J, Liu H, Xia N. 2022. Parahellenia, a new genus segregated from Hellenia (Costaceae) based on phylogenetic and morphological evidence. Plant Divers 44 (4): 389-405. DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2022.02.001.
Edeoga HO, Okoli BE. 1998. Anatomy and systematics in the Costus afer-C. lucanusianus complex (Costaceae). Acta Phytotax Geobot 48 (2): 151-158. DOI: 10.18942/bunruichiri.KJ00001077507.
El-Far A, Shaheen H, Alsenosy A, El-Sayed Y, Al Jaouni S, Mousa S. 2018. Costus speciosus: Traditional uses, phytochemistry, and therapeutic potentials. Pharmacogn Rev 12 (23): 120-127. DOI: 10.4103/phrev.phrev_29_17.
FOC. 2024. Costus speciosus (J. König) Smith. Flora of China. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200028360.
Hegde PL, Harini A, Kumar KS, Rao PN. 2016. Macro-microscopy and TLC atlas of leaves of Costus igneus Nak. J Ayu Med Sci 1 (1): 5-11. DOI: 10.5530/jams.2016.1.3.
Khan MF, Ramu A. 2018. Spectral characterization of bioactive compounds from Costus pictus and Costus speciosus. Int J Chemtech Res 11 (9): 353-363. DOI: 10.20902/IJCTR.2018.110941.
Kumar M, Misra A, Srivastava A, Shukla PK, Tewari LM, Srivastava S. 2020. Comparative pharmacognostical and pharmacological eval__uation of Costus speciosus (Koen) JE Sm. germplasm collected from eastern ghats of India. Pharmacogn J 12 (1): 150-156. DOI: 10.5530/pj.2020.12.22.
Li DM, Pan YG, Liu HL, Yu B, Huang D, Zhu GF. 2024. Thirteen complete chloroplast genomes of the costaceae family: insights into genome structure, selective pressure and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Genomics 25 (1): 68. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-09996-4.
Ministry of Health. 2017. Vietnamese Pharmacopoeia V. Medical Publishing House. Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Muyumba NW, Mutombo SC, Sheridan H, Nachtergael A, Duez P. 2021. Quality control of herbal drugs and preparations: The methods of analysis, their relevance and applications. Talanta Open 4: 100070. DOI: 10.1016/j.talo.2021.100070.
Osman AG, Raman V, Haider S, Ali Z, Chittiboyina AG, Khan IA. 2019. Overview of analytical tools for the identification of 3 adulterants in commonly traded herbs and spices. J AOAC Intl 102 (2): 376-385. DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0389.
Pazhanichamy K, Pavithra S, Rubini S, Lavanya B, Ramya I, Eevera T. 2010. Morphological, anatomical and proximate analysis of leaf, root, rhizome of Costus igneus. J Pharm Res 3 (4): 747-752.
POWO. 2024a. Costaceae Nakai. Plants of the World Online. Kew Science. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30008905-2.
POWO. 2024b. Costus L. Plants of the World Online. Kew Science. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:329965-2.
POWO. 2024c. Costus pictus D.Don. Plants of the World Online. Kew Science. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:796354-1.
POWO. 2024d. Hellenia speciosa (J.Koenig) S.R.Dutta. Plants of the World Online. Kew Science. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60469691-2.
Selvakumarasamy S, Rengaraju B, Arumugam SA, Kulathooran R. 2021. Costus pictus–transition from a medicinal plant to functional food: A review. Future Foods 4: 100068. DOI: 10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100068.
Shaikh SS, Bawazir AS, Yahya BA. 2022. Phytochemical, histochemical and in vitro antimicrobial study of various solvent extracts of Costus speciosus (J. Koenig) SM. and Costus pictus D. Don. Turk J Pharm Sci 19 (2): 145-152. DOI: 10.4274/tjps.galenos.2021.02058.
Shehu S, Abubakar AZ, Danmalam UH, Ilyas N, Danjuma NM. 2021. Pharmacognostic and elemental analysis of the rhizome of C. spectabilis (Fenzl) Schumann (Costaceae). J Pharm Bioresources 18 (1): 25-31. DOI: 10.4314/jpb.v18i1.3.
Smisha KP, Sabu M. 2018. Morphological And Anatomical Features Of Seeds Of Some Taxa Of Costaceae. Bangladesh J Bot 47 (2): 211-218.
Sonibare MA, Isola AO, Akinmurele OJ. 2023. Pharmacognostic standardisation of the leaves of Costus afer Ker Gawl. (Zingiberaceae) and Palisota hirsuta (Thunb.) K. Schum.(Commelinaceae). Futur J Pharm Sci 9 (1): 19. DOI: 10.1186/s43094-023-00469-1.
Srivastava S, Misra A. 2018. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs: Advancements and Challenges. In: Singh B, Peter K. (eds) New Age Herbals: Resource, Quality and Pharmacognosy. Springer, Singapore 2018: 189-290. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8291-7_10.
Thomas SC. 2016. Taxonomic, molecular and physiological eval__uation of Costus pictus D. Don plants originally obtained from different parts of Kerala, India. J Fundam Appl Sci 2 (2): 141-148.
Tomlinson PB. 1956. Studies in the systematic anatomy of the Zingiberaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 55 (361): 547-592.
Van Chen T, Lam DNX, Thong CLT, Nguyen DD, Nhi NTT, Triet NT. 2022. Morphological characters, pharmacognostical parameters, and preliminary phytochemical screening of Curcuma sahuynhensis Škorni?k. & NS. Lý in Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Biodiversitas 23 (8): 3907-3920. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d230807.
Van Chen TRAN, Lam DNX, Khai HD, Duc DPN, Nga NT, Hien NTT, Quynh TTT. 2024. Micromorphology, physicochemical parameters, and phytochemical screening of Chloranthus flavus DT Liu & G. Chen (syn. C. nervosus Collett & Hemsl.) from Vietnam. Biodiversitas 25 (2): 846-858. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d250245.
Waisundara VY, Watawana MI, Jayawardena N. 2015. Costus speciosus and Coccinia grandis: Traditional medicinal remedies for diabetes. S Afr J Bot 98 (2015): 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.01.012.
WHO [World Health Organization]. 2011. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. Geneva: WHO Press.
WHO [World Health Organization]. 2018. Fifty-second report of the WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1010.