Prediction of genetic gain in Ficus variegata progeny trial based on breeding value
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Haryjanto L, Prastyono, Hadiyan Y, Susanto M. 2019. Prediction of genetic gain in Ficus variegata progeny trial based on breeding value. Biodiversitas 20: 2994-2999. Prediction of genetic gain in Ficus variegata Blume progeny trial based on breeding values. The aim of this study was to estimate the breeding value based on components variance and genetic gain prediction of Ficus variegata Blume using REML/BLUP. A total of 17 families of Ficus variegata Blume were evaluated at three years after planting at progeny trial in Mangunan, Bantul, Yogyakarta laid out in Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD). Estimation of variance family (height and diameter) were ± 5% of total variance. Narrow-sense individual heritability was moderate (0.27 and 0.21 respectively) indicated promising genetic improvement. Strong genetic correlation of height and diameter (rG=0.9) indicated that improving a trait will improving others. BLUP analysis for diameter trait showed that the best individual value from best family selection was appropriated with restriction 10 family and 5 individual per family and genetic gain prediction was 15.83% gave acceptable rate of inbreeding 2% per generation.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Cotteril PP, Dean CA. 1990. Successful Tree Breeding With Index Selection. CSIRO Devision of Forestry and Forest Product. Australia.
Belonsky GM, Kennedy BW. 1988. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd. Journal of Animal Science 66(5):1124-1131.
BKSDA NTB. 2010. Panduan Wisata Alam di Kawasan Konservasi Nusa Tenggara Barat. http://ekowisata.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Panduan-Wisata-BKSDA-NTB.pdf.
Filho JSS, Vencovsky R. 2000. Efficiency of combined selection over sequential selection in forest tree progeny trials. Silvae Genetica 49: 169-173.
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Edinburgh Gate.464pp.
Fries A, Ericsson T. 2006. Estimating genetic parameter for wood density of Scot pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Silvae Genetica 55(2): 84-92.
Haryjanto L, Prastyono, Yuskianti V. 2014. Variasi pertumbuhan dan parameter genetik pada tiga plot uji keturunan nyawai (Ficus variegata Blume) di Bantul. Jurnal Pemuliaan Tanaman Hutan 8(3): 137–151.
Keiding H. 1993. Gene conservation and tree improvement. Lecture Note D-9. Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek, Denmark.
Klápšt? J, Lstib?rek M, Kobliha J. 2007. Initial evaluation of half-sib progenies of Norway spruce using the best linear unbiased prediction. Journal of Forest Science (41130): 41–46.
Kuaraksa C, Elliott S, Hossaert-mckey M. 2012. The phenology of dioecious Ficus spp. Tree Species and Its Importance for Forest Restoration Projects. Forest Ecology and Management 265: 82-93.
Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., MA, 971.
Magnussen S, Yeatman CW. 1990. Predictions of genetic gain from various selection methods in open pollinated Pinus banksiana progeny trials. Silvae Genetica 39: 140-153.
Mashudi, Baskorowati L. 2015. Estimasi parameter genetik pada uji keturunan Alstonia scholaris umur dua tahun di Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pemuliaan Tanaman Hutan 9(1): 1–12.
Matheson AC, Raymond CA. 1994. Effects of thinning in progeny test on estimates of genetic parameters in Pinus radiata. Silvae Genetica 33(4): 125-128.
Matziris D. 2005. Genetic variation and realized genetic gain from Black pine tree improvement. Silvae Genetica 54(3): 96-104.
Ministry of Forestry. 2008. Sambutan Menteri Kehutanan pada Acara Penanaman Serentak Seratus Juta Pohon dalam Rangka Peringatan Seratus Tahun Kebangkitan Nasional di Seluruh Indonesia Tanggal 28 November 2008. http://www.dephut.go.id/ index.php?q=id/node/4951. Retreived 20 Maret 2011.
Prastyono and Susanto M. 2015. Variasi sifat pertumbuhan ulin (Eusideroxylon zwageri T. et B.) pada uji keturunan di Bondowoso. Jurnal Wasian 2(2): 79-86
Oliveira EJ, Santana FA, Oliveira LA, Santos VS. 2014. Genetic parameters and prediction of genotypic values for root quality traits in cassava using REML / BLUP. Genetic and Molecular Research 13(3): 6683–6700.
Qirom MA, Supriyadi. 2013. Model penduga volume pohon nyawai (Ficus variegate Blume) di Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal HutanTanaman 10(4): 173-184.
Resende MDV. 2002. Genética Biométrica e Estatística no Melhoramentode Plantas Perenes. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasília, 975 pp.
Schmidt FH, Ferguson JHA. 1951. Rainfall Types Based on Wet and Dry Period Ratios for Indonesia with Western New Guinee. Kementerian Perhubungan. Djawatan Meteorologi dan Geofisik Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
Spencer H, Weibleni G, Flick B. 1996. Phenology of Ficus variegate in a seasonal wet tropical Phenology of Ficus variegata at forest Cape Tribulation. Australia. Journal of Biogeography 23: 467–475.
Sumarni G, Muslich M, Hadjib N, Krisdianto, Malik D, Suprapti S, Basri E, Pari G, Iskandar MI, Siagian RM. 2009. Sifat dan Kegunaan Kayu: 15 Jenis Andalan Setempat Jawa Barat. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan. Bogor.
Susanto M. 2008. Analisis komponen varian uji keturunan Melaleuca cajuputi subsp. cajuputi di Paliyan, Gunungkidul. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman 5 Suplemen No.1
Susanto M., Baskorowati L. Setiadi D. 2014. Estimasi Peningkatan Genetik Falcataria moluccana di Cikampek Jawa Barat. JurnalPenelitian Hutan Tanaman 11(2): 65-76.
Weng YH, Tosh KJ, Park YS, Fullarton MS. 2007. Age-age trends in genetic parameters for Jack pine and their implications for early selection. Silvae Genetica 56(5): 242-251.
White TL. 1996. Genetic parameter estimates and breeding valuepredictions: issues and implications in tree improvement programs. In: Tree Improvement for Sustainable Tropical Forestry. (Eds. Dieters, M. J., Matheson, A. C., Nickles, D. G, Hardwood, C. E. and Walker, S. M.). Proc. QFRI-IUFRO Conf. Caloundra, Queensland, Australia: 27 Oct.- 1 Nov 1996, p. 110.
White TL, Hodge R. 1987. Practical uses of breeding values in tree improvement programs and their prediction from progeny test data. In: Proc. 191h South. For. Tree Improve. Conf. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ., 1987, p. 276-283.
White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB. 2007. Forest Genetics. CABI Publishing, UK
Xiang B, Li B. 2001. A new mixed analutical method for genetic analysis of diallel data. Canadian Journal Forest Research 31: 2252–2259.
Zhekun Z, Gilbert MG. 2003. Moraceae. Flora of China 5: 21-73.
Zobel B, Talbert J. 1984. Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Willey and Sons. New York. 505pp.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- NURPANA SULAKSONO, SATYAWAN PUDYATMOKO, SOEMARDI, WAHYU WARDHANA, YAYAN HADIYAN, SANDY NURVIANTO, Response of terrestrial mammals to various types of disturbance in the Gunung Merapi National Park, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2022)