Tangible economic value of non-timber forest products from peat swamp forest in Kampar, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

BINTANG C.H. SIMANGUNSONG
ELISA G.T. MANURUNG
ELIAS ELIAS
MANUNTUN P. HUTAGAOL
JUSUPTA TARIGAN
SIGIT B. PRABAWA

Abstract

Abstract. Simangunsong BCH, Manurung EGT, Elias, Hutagaol MP, Tarigan J, Prabawa SB. 2020. Tangible economic value of non-timber forest products from peat swamp forest in Kampar, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21: 5954-5960. Development of alternative economy based on non-timber forest products usage is an important means to prevent forest conversion and preserve the quality of a forest ecosystem. The main objectives of this study were to identify and calculate the economic value from tangible/marketable perspective of the non-timber forest products (NTFPs) provided by peat swamp forest in Kampar, Sumatra, Indonesia. This is one of the largest remaining peat swamp forest ecosystems in the country. Seven villages located around that forest ecosystem with total forest cover area of 201,224 ha were chosen as samples. A conversion return approach was used to estimate the economic value of non-timber forest products. The results showed 18 kinds of non-timber forest products were identified, but only seven were used commercially by community. They are jungle rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), sago (Metroxylon sp.), swiftlet nest (Aerodramus fuciphagus), honey, betel nut (Areca catechu L), Agathis resin (Agathis dammara), and pandan (Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb.) The obtained economic value of NTFPs was very low, which was about Rp 9,367.4 (or US$0.68 ha-1 yr-1). Market development of non-timber forest products is then crucial, and the government should play an important role in promoting it in collaboration with private companies. Non-marketed non-timber forest products and various environmental services should also be taken into account to measure that peat swamp forest ecosystem value. Otherwise, concerns about the sustainability of that forest ecosystem in Indonesia due to undervaluation of forest resources will continue.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Borner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S. 2014. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global comparative analysis. World Dev 64: 12–28.
Arnold JEM., Perez MR. 2001. Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives??. Ecol Econ 39: 437–447.
Bahruni, Suhendang E, Darusman D, Alikodra HS. 2007. A system approach to estimate total economic value of forest ecosystem: use value of timber and non timber forest products. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan 4(3): 369–378.
Belcher B, Ruiz-Perez M, Achdiawan R. 2005. Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: implications for livelihoods and conservation. World Dev 33(9): 1435–1452.
Dash M, Behera B, Rahut DB. 2016. Determinants of household collection of non-timber forest products ( NTFPs ) and alternative livelihood activities in Similipal Tiger Reserve, India. For Policy and Econ 73: 215–228
Dawson IK, Leakey R, Clement CR, Weber JC, Cornelius JP, Roshetko JM, Vinceti B, Kalinganire A, Tchoundjeu Z, Masters E, Jamnadass R. 2014. The management of tree genetic resources and the livelihoods of rural communities in the tropics: non-timber forest products , smallholder agroforestry practices and tree commodity crops. For Ecol and Manag 333: 9–21.
Delang CO. 2006. Not just minor forest products: the economic rationale for the consumption of wild food plants by subsistence farmers. Ecol Econ 59(1): 64–73.
Delgado TS, McCall MK, López-Binqüist C. 2016. Recognized but not supported: assessing the incorporation of non-timber forest products into Mexican forest policy. For Policy and Econ 71: 36–42.
FAO. 1995. Non-wood forest products for rural income and sustainable forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome.
Ghate R, Mehra D, Nagendra H. 2009. Local institutions as mediators of the impact of markets on non-timber forest product extraction in central India. Environ Conserv 36(1): 51–61.
Gillet P, Vermeulen C, Doucet JL, Codina E, Lehnebach C, Feintrenie L. 2016. What Are the impacts of deforestation on the harvest of non-timber forest froducts in Central Africa??. Forest 7(12): 1–15.
Godoy R, Overman H, Demmer J, Apaza L, Byron E, Huanca T, Leonard W, Perez E, Reyes-Garcia V, Vadez V, Wilkie D, Cubas A, McSweeney K, Brokaw N. 2002. Local financial benefits of rain forests: comparative evidence from Amerindian societies in Bolivia and Honduras. Ecol Econ 40(3): 397–409.
Gram. 2001. Economic valuation of special forest products: an assessment of methodological shortcomings. Ecological Economics 36: 109–117. Guariguata MR, Cronkleton P, Shanley P, Taylor PL. 2008. The compatibility of timber and non-timber forest product extraction and management. For Eco and Manag 256: 1477–1481.
Guariguata MR, Garcia-Fernandez C, Sheil D, Nasi R, Herrero-Jauregui C, Cronkleton P, Ingram, V. 2010. Compatibility of timber and non-timber forest product management in natural tropical forests: perspectives , challenges, and opportunities. For Ecol and Manag 259: 237–245.
He J, Dong M,Stark M. 2014. Small Mushrooms for Big Business? Gaps in the Sustainable Management of Non-Timber Forest Products in Southwest China. Sustainability 6(10): 6847–6861.
Heubach K, Wittig R, Nuppenau E, Hahn K. 2011. The economic importance of non-timber forest products ( NTFPs ) for livelihood maintenance of rural west African communities: a case study from northern Benin. Ecol Econ 70(11): 1991–2001.
IIED. 2003. Valuing forests: a review of methods and applications ind developing countries. Environmental Economics Programme, London.
Institut Pertanian Bogor. 1999. Kajian Sistem Nilai Hutan Produksi. Fakultas Kehutanan, Bogor.
Janse G, Ottitsch A. 2005. Factors influencing the role of Non-Wood Forest Products and Services. Forst Policy and Econ 7: 309–319.
Kim YC. 2002. Pola pengelolaan hutan tropika berdasar pada konsep nilai ekonomi total. [Dissertation] Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta. [Indonesian].
Klemperer WD. 1996. Forest Resource Economics and Finance. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
Krishnakumar J, Yanagida JF, Anitha V, Balakrishnan R, Radovich TJK. 2014. Non-timber forest products certification and management: a socioeconomic study among the Kadars in Kerala, India. Environment, Dev and Sustain 17(4): 837-858.
Mahapatra AK, Tewari DD. 2005. Importance of non-timber forest products in the economic valuation of dry deciduous forests of India. For Policy and Econ 7: 455–467.
Marshall E, Newton AC, Schreckenberg K. 2003. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products?: first steps in analysing the factors influencing success. Int For Rev 5(2): 128–137.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia. 2018. The State of Indonesia’s Forests 2018. Ministry of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta.
Ndangalasi HJ, Bitariho R, Dovie DBK. 2007. Harvesting of non-timber forest products and implications for onservation in two montane forests of East Africa. Biol Conserv 134(2): 242–250.
Ren Y, Kuuluvainen J, Toppinen A, Yao S, Berghall S, Karppinen H, Xue C, Yang, L. 2018. The effect of China ’ s new circular collective forest tenure reform on household non-timber forest product production in natural forest protection project regions. Sustainability 10(4): 1–17.
Riera P, Signorello G, Thiene M, Mahieu P, Navrud S, Kaval P, Rulleau B, Mavsar R, Madureira L, Meyerhoff J, Elsasser P, Nataro S, De-Salvo M, Giergiczny M, Dragoi S. 2012. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: good practice guidelines. J of For Econ 18(4): 259–270.
Ros-Tonen MAF, Wiersum KF. 2005. The Scope for improving rural livelihoods through non-timber forest products: an evolving research agenda. For,Trees and Livelihoods 15(2): 129–148.
Saha D, Sundriyal RC. 2012. Utilization of non-timber forest products in humid tropics: implications for management and livelihood. For Policy and Econ 14(1): 28–40.
Sakai S, Choy YK, Kishimoto-yamada K, Takano KT, Ichikawa M, Samejima, H, Yumi K, Soda R, Ushio M, Saizen I, Nakashizuka T, Itioka, T. 2016. Social and ecological factors associated with the use of non-timber forest products by people in rural Borneo. Biol Conserv 204: 340-349.
Salafsky N, Wollenberg E. 2000. Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Dev 28(8): 1421–1438.
Schaafsma M, Morse-jones S, Posen P, Swetnam RD, Balmford A, Bateman, IJ, Burgess ND, Chamshama SAO, Fisher B, Freeman T, Geofrey V, Green RE, Hepelwa AS, Hernandez-sirvent A, Hess S, Kajembe GC, Kayharara G, Kilonzo M, Kulindwa K, Lund JF, Madoffe SS, Mbwambo L, Meilby H, Ngaga YM, Theilade I, Treue T, Van-Beukering P, Vyamana VG, Turner RK. 2014. The importance of local forest benefits: economic valuation of non-timber forest products in the Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania. Glob Environ Change 24: 295–305.
Shackleton CM, Pandey AK. 2014. Positioning non-timber forest products on the development agenda. For Policy and Econ 38: 1–7.
Shone BM, Caviglia-Harris JL. 2006. Quantifying and comparing the value of non-timber forest products in the Amazon. Ecol Econ 58: 249–267.
Simangunsong BCH, 2003. The economic value of Indonesia’s natural production forest. Indonesian Working Group on Forest Finance, Jakarta.
Simangunsong BCH, Sitanggang VJ, Manurung EGT, Rahmadi A, Moore GA, Aye L, Tambunan AH. 2017. Potential forest biomass resource as feedstock for bioenergy and its economic value in Indonesia. For Policy and Economics 81: 10–17.
Stanley D, Voeks R, Short L. 2012. Is non-timber forest products harvest sustainable in the Less Developed World?? A systematic review of the recent economic and ecological literature. Ethnobiol and Conserv 1(9): 1–39.
Stenger A, Harou P, Navrud S. 2009. Valuing environmental goods and services derived from the forests. J of For Econ 15: 1–14.
Tiwari BK, Kumar C, Lynser MB. 2009. The future of non-wood forest production. In Leslie R. N. (ed.), The Future of Forests in Asia and the Pacific: Outlook for 2020, Oct 16-18, 2007, Chiang Mai. FAO, Bangkok.
Tropenbos Indonesia. 2010. Penilaian Kawasan dengan Nilai Konservasi Tinggi Di Semenanjung Kampar. Tropenbos Indonesia (TBI), Jakarta.
Yayasan Mitra Insani. 2008. Dokumen potensi desa teluk meranti. www.adoc.tips/dokumen-potensi-desa-teluk-meranti.html