Short Communication: Examining taxa representation in Asian zoos and aquaria using historic records

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

JAMES EDWARD BRERETON
SHELBY RENEE BRERETON

Abstract

Abstract. Brereton JE, Brereton SR. 2021. Short Communication: Examining taxa representation in Asian zoos and aquaria using historic records. Biodiversitas 22: 2870-2875. According to the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA), modern zoological collections should engage in conservation and education-based activities: to do this, the collections must house animals that are interesting to their visitors. There is a plethora of evidence to suggest that zoo visitors and the wider public are more interested in mammals than any other taxa. This ‘mammal bias’ is known to extend into facets of science, such as in reintroduction and zoo research literature. Previous studies on zoo collection planning, however, have identified that globally, zoological collections actually contain more species of bird and fish on average than mammals. At current, there is limited information on the composition of Asian zoological collections. Data on the number of species per taxa (amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, mammals, and reptiles) housed at each zoo globally was collected from the International Zoo Yearbook’s ‘Zoos and Aquariums of the World’ from 1960 until 2018. Additional data including the visitor attendance age and size of the collection was recorded. The composition of Asian zoo collection plans was compared against zoos globally, and a longitudinal investigation of Asian Zoo composition was also conducted. Additionally, Poisson regressions were run to determine whether the proportional representation of taxa, year, or visitor attendance were predictors of the numbers of animal species at the collection. Overall, the number of species per taxa significantly differed between Asian collections and the global averages, with Asian collections generally containing greater numbers of invertebrates and fish, and comparatively fewer reptiles. There were similarities in the number of species per taxa over time between Asian collections and zoological collections globally. This study suggests that the influences that affect the species housed in zoos and aquariums more globally are also influencing those in Asian countries.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Agoramoorthy G. 2004. Ethics and welfare in Southeast Asian zoos. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 7: 189-195.
Banes GL, Chua W, Elder M, Kao J. 2018. Orang?utans Pongo spp in Asian zoos: current status, challenges and progress towards long?term population sustainability. Int. Zoo Yearb. 52: 150-163.
Bomford M. 2003. Risk assessment for the import and keeping of exotic vertebrates in Australia. Bureau of Rural Sciences.
Brereton JE. 2020. Directions in animal enclosure use studies. J. Zoo Aq. Res. 8(1), 1-9.
Brereton SR, Brereton JE. 2020. Sixty years of collection planning: what species do zoos and aquariums keep?. Int. Zoo Yearb. 54(1), 131-145.
Browne RK, Wolfram K, García G, Bagaturov MF, Pereboom, ZJJM. 2011. Zoo-based amphibian research and conservation breeding programs. Amphibian and Reptile Cons. 5: 1-14.
Carr N. 2016. An analysis of zoo visitors' favourite and least favourite animals. Tourism Man. Persp. 20: 70-76.
Cohn JP. 2006. New at the Zoo: ZIMS. BioScience, 56(7), 564-566.
Conway W. 2003. The role of zoos in the 21st century. Int. Zoo Yearb. 38: 7-13.
Coote T, Loeve E. 2003. From 61 species to five: endemic tree snails of the Society Islands fall prey to an ill-judged biological control programme. Oryx, 37: 91-96.
Courchamp F, Jaric I, Albert C, Meinard Y, Ripple WJ, Chapron G. 2018. The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals. PLoS Biol. 16: 1-12.
Duggan IC, Rixon CA, MacIsaac HJ. 2006. Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of introduction and establishment of aquarium fish. Biol. Invasions 8: 377-382.
Durrell G. 1960 . A Zoo in my luggage. London, UK: Penguin Books.
Earnhardt JM, Thompson SD, Willis K. 1995. ISIS database: an evaluation of records essential for captive management. Zoo Biol. 14: 493-508.
Esson M, Moss A. 2016. The challenges of evaluating conservation education across cultures. Int. Zoo Yearb. 50: 61-67.
Goulart VD, Azevedo PG, van de Schepop JA, Teixeira CP, Barçante L, Azevedo CS, Young RJ. 2009. GAPs in the study of zoo and wild animal welfare. Zoo Biol 28: 561-573.
Hutchins M, Thompson SD. 2008. Zoo and aquarium research: priority setting for the coming decades. Zoo Biol. 27: 488-497.
IUCN. 2021. Summary statistics. https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/summary-statistics#Tables_1_2
Jensen EA, Moss A, Gusset M. 2017. Quantifying long?term impact of zoo and aquarium visits on biodiversity?related learning outcomes. Zoo Biol. 36: 294-297.
Kusrini M, Palesa SP, Masy'ud B. 2021. Snake pet ownership in the city: A case study in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 1-11.
Lacy RC. 2013. Achieving true sustainability of zoo populations. Zoo Biol. 32: 19-26.
Lees CM, Wilcken J. 2009. Sustaining the Ark: the challenges faced by zoos in maintaining viable populations. Int. Zoo Yearb. 43: 6-18.
Martin TE, Lurbiecki H, Joy JB, Mooers AO. 2014. Mammal and bird species held in zoos are less endemic and less threatened than their close relatives not held in zoos. Anim. Cons. 17: 89-96.
Melfi VA. 2009. There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: a case for evidence?based zoo animal management. Zoo Biol. 28: 574-588.
Moss A, Esson M. 2010. Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes. Zoo Biol 29: 715-731.
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
Ng PK, Tan HH. 1997. Freshwater fishes of Southeast Asia: potential for the aquarium fish trade and conservation issues. Aq. Sci. Cons. 1: 79-90.
Nijman V, Martinez CFY, Shepherd CR. 2009. Saved from trade: donated and confiscated gibbons in zoos and rescue centres in Indonesia. Endangered Species Res. 9: 151-157.
Rivera SN, Knight A, McCulloch SP. 2021. Surviving the Wildlife Trade in Southeast Asia: Reforming the ‘Disposal’of Confiscated Live Animals under CITES. Animals 11: 1-20.
Ryan LG. 1996. Insect musicians & cricket champions: a cultural history of singing insects in China and Japan. China Books.
Sheppard C. 1995. Propagation of endangered birds in US institutions: how much space is there?. Zoo Biol. 14: 197-210.
Sigsgaard SN. 2009. Conservation in zoo shops today and in the future: a case study and discussion. Int. Zoo Yearb. 43: 91-102.
Smith B, Hutchins M, Allard R, Warmolts D. 2002. Regional collection planning for speciose taxonomic groups. Zoo Biol. 21: 313-320.
Traylor?Holzer K., Leus K., Bauman K. 2019. Integrated collection assessment and planning (ICAP) workshop: helping zoos move toward the One Plan Approach. Zoo Biol. 38: 95-105.
Ward PI, Mosberger N, Kistler C, Fischer O. 1998. The relationship between popularity and body size in zoo animals. Cons. Biol. 12: 1408-1411.
Wilkinson R. 2000. An overview of captive?management programmes and regional collection planning for parrots. Int. Zoo Yearb. 37: 36-58.
Whitham JC, Wielebnowski N. 2013. New directions for zoo animal welfare science. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 147: 247-260.
Woodside DP, Kelly JD. 1995. The development of local, national and international zoo?based education programmes. Int. Zoo Yearb. 34: 231-246.