Gender perspectives on agroforestry practices in Mt. Merapi hazards and risks prone area of Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ZUHUD ROZAKI
NUR RAHMAWATI
OKI WIJAYA
FADHILAH SAFITRI
MASATERU SENGE
MOHD FAUZI KAMARUDIN

Abstract

Abstract. Rozaki Z, Rahmawati N, Wijaya O, Safitri F, Senge M, Kamarudin MF. 2021. Gender perspectives on agroforestry practices in Mt. Merapi hazards and risks-prone area of Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22: 2980-2987. Despite the risk and hazards of the Mt. Merapi prone area, people continue to stay in the area as Agroforestry Adopters. This study aims to analyze the gender perspectives on agroforestry (AF) practices in the Mt. Merapi prone area. 128 men and 86 women were randomly selected from four different areas. Descriptive analysis, independent t-test, and logistic multinomial regression were used to analyze the data. Gender issue in AF practices is found in some parts of the practices. For example, women are more predominant in marketing the products rather than men, whilst the men are predominant in activities that need more strength such as planting. An external factor that is significant is the different impacts of farmers support groups on men and women. Meanwhile, factors such as capital access and AF easiness do not show significant differences between men and women. In other words, these two variables are felt the same among men and women when practicing AF. As for the contribution of AF, social aspect is found to show significant differences, whilst economic and ecology do not show significant differences to both the men and women. Additionally, factors that affect the perspectives on AF contribution vary among the respondents across both groups of men and women. This study suggests that the different perspectives and factors that are affecting AF farmers can be used to develop future AF promotion programs.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Adzawla W, Azumah SB, Anani PY, Donkoh SA. 2019. Gender perspectives of climate change adaptation in two selected districts of Ghana. Heliyon, 5(11), e02854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02854
Ahmad F, Goparaju L, Qayum A. 2017. Agroforestry suitability analysis based upon nutrient availability mapping: A GIS based suitability mapping. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2017.2.201
Akter S, Rutsaert P, Luis J, Htwe NM, San SS, Raharjo B Pustika A. 2017. Women’s empowerment and gender equity in agriculture: A different perspective from Southeast Asia. Food Policy, 69, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.003
Bachri S, Stötter J, Monreal M, Sartohadi J. 2015. The calamity of eruptions, or an eruption of benefits? Mt. Bromo human-volcano system a case study of an open-risk perception. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-277-2015
Bee BA. 2016. Power, perception, and adaptation: Exploring gender and social-environmental risk perception in northern Guanajuato, Mexico. Geoforum, 69, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.12.006
Bergman Lodin J, Tegbaru A, Bullock R, Degrande A, Nkengla LW, Gaya HI. 2019. Gendered mobilities and immobilities: Women’s and men’s capacities for agricultural innovation in Kenya and Nigeria. Gender, Place and Culture, 26(12), 1759–1783. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1618794
Blare T, Useche P. 2015. Is there a choice? Choice experiment to determine the value men and women place on cacao agroforests in coastal Ecuador. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086390
Bose P. 2015. India’s drylands agroforestry: a ten-year analysis of gender and social diversity, tenure and climate variability. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086435
Bourne M, Kimaiyo J, Tanui J, Catacutan D, Otiende V. 2015. Can gender appreciation of trees enhance landscape multifunctionality? A case of smallholder farming systems on Mount Elgon. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086480
Carter NH, Allendorf TD. 2016. Gendered perceptions of tigers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Biological Conservation, 202, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.002
Catacutan D, Naz F. 2015. Gender roles, decision-making and challenges to agroforestry adoption in Northwest Vietnam. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086381
Dey S., Resurreccion BP, Doneys P. 2014. Gender and environmental struggles: voices from Adivasi Garo community in Bangladesh. Gender, Place and Culture, 21(8), 945–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.832662
Gelinas N, Lavoie A, Labrecque MF, Olivier A. 2015. Linking women, trees and sheep in Mali. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086462
Glemarec Y. 2017. Addressing the gender differentiated investment risks to climate-smart agriculture. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.56
Khan AA, Rana I, Nawaz A. 2020. Gender-based approach for assessing risk perception in a multi-hazard environment: A study of high schools of Gilgit, Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 44, 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101427
Khandekar N, Gorti G, Bhadwal S, Rijhwani V. 2019. Perceptions of climate shocks and gender vulnerabilities in the Upper Ganga Basin. Environmental Development, 31(February), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.02.001
Kiptot E. 2015. Gender roles, responsibilities, and spaces: implications for agroforestry research and development in Africa. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086426
Kiptot E, Franzel S. 2011. Gender and agroforestry in Africa: are women participating. ICRAF Occasional Paper, January. https://doi.org/10.5716/OP16988
Maharani YN, Lee S, Ki SJ. 2016. Social vulnerability at a local level around the Merapi volcano. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 20(July), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.012
Mulyoutami E, Roshetko JM, Martini E, Awalina D, Janudianto. 2015. Gender roles and knowledge in plant species selection and domestication: A case study in South and Southeast Sulawesi. International Forestry Review, 17, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086453
Mustaqim A. 2021. Kubah Lava Gunung Merapi Menurun Usai Guguran Awan Panas Tinggi (Mount Merapi’s Lava Domes Decreased After High Heat Clouds Falling). Medcom.Id. https://www.medcom.id/nasional/daerah/yNL4gBvN-kubah-lava-gunung-merapi-menurun-usai-guguran-awan-panas-tinggi
Napsiah N, Gunawan B, Abdoellah OS, Sulaeman M. 2017. Economic Rationality of Residents Living in the Area Prone to Merapi Volcanic Disaster. KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 9(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v9i2.10002
Nephawe N, Mwale M, Zuwarimwe J, & Tjale MM. 2021. The Impact of Water-Related Challenges on Rural Communities Food Security Initiatives. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research 7(1), 11–23.
Nofrita S, Krol BGCMB. 2014. The Livelihood Analysis in Merapi Prone Area After 2010 Eruption. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 46(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.5790
Rahman MB, Nurhasanah IS, Nugroho SP. 2016. Community Resilience: Learning from Mt Merapi Eruption 2010. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227(November 2015), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.090
Rakib MA, Islam S, Nikolaos I, Bodrud-Doza M, Bhuiyan MAH. 2017.. Flood vulnerability, local perception and gender role judgment using multivariate analysis: A problem-based “participatory action to Future Skill Management” to cope with flood impacts. Weather and Climate Extremes, 18(November), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2017.10.002
Rao EJO & Qaim M. 2013. Supermarkets and agricultural labor demand in Kenya: A gendered perspective. Food Policy, 38(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.11.008
Ratdomopurbo A, Beauducel F, Subandriyo J, Agung Nandaka IGM, Newhall CG, Suharna, Sayudi DS, Suparwaka H, Sunarta. (2013). Overview of the 2006 eruption of Mt. Merapi. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 261, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.03.019
Rietveld (Anne) AM, van der Burg (Margreet) M, Groot (Jeroen) JCJ. 2020. Bridging youth and gender studies to analyse rural young women and men’s livelihood pathways in Central Uganda. Journal of Rural Studies, 75(December 2019), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.020
Rozaki Z, Rahmawati N, Wijaya O, Mubarok AF, Senge M, Kamarudin MF. 2021. A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt . Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 22(6), 2511–2518. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220661
Thompson-Hall M. (2016). Land Restoration, Agriculture, and Climate Change: Enriching Gender Programming Through Strengthening Intersectional Perspectives. In Land Restoration: Reclaiming Landscapes for a Sustainable Future. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801231-4.00028-8
Utami SNH, Purwanto BH, Marwasta D. (2018). Land Management for Agriculture After The 2010 Merapi Eruption. Planta Tropika: Journal of Agro Science, 6(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.18196/pt.2018.078.32-38
Villamor GB, Akiefnawati R, Van Noordwijk M, Desrianti F, Pradhan U. 2015. Land use change and shifts in gender roles in central Sumatra, Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 17(4), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086444
Wikanto A. 2021. Gunung Merapi meletus lagi Rabu (27/1/2021) siang, warga turun mengungsi (Mount Merapi erupted again Wednesday (1/27/2021) afternoon, residents fled). Kontan.Co.Id. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/gunung-merapi-meletus-lagi-rabu-2712021-siang-warga-turun-mengungsi

Most read articles by the same author(s)