Molecular phylogenetics of Malesian Diospyros (Ebenaceae) based trnL-F spacer sequences

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
DOI https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220959
Issue
Vol. 22 No. 9 (2021)
Section
Articles

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

IRVAN FADLI WANDA
Research Center for Plant Conservation and Botanic Gardens, Indonesian Institute of Sciences. Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 13, Bogor16122, West Java, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5983-8057
NINA RATNA DJUITA
Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Jl. Agatis, Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680, West Java, Indonesia
TATIK CHIKMAWATI ♥
Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Jl. Agatis, Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680, West Java, Indonesia

Abstract

Abstract. Wanda IF, Djuita NR, Chikmawati T. 2021. Molecular phylogenetics of Malesian Diospyros (Ebenaceae) based trnL-F spacer sequences. Biodiversitas 22: 4106-4114. Diospyros is a genus composed of potential species as an economic commodity with high diversity. However, there is limited information on the phylogenetic relationship of this genus in the Malesian region. This study aimed to provide information on the species diversity through a DNA barcoding approach and revealing the phylogenetic information of Diospyros spp. in the Malesian region. This study used 20 Diospyros accessions from Bogor Botanical Garden collections, 40 Diospyros accessions, and four outgroup accessions obtained from the NCBI database. The DNA barcoding primer utilized comes from plastids, trnL-F intergenic spacer. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Maximum-Parsimony method. A total of 20 accessions of Diospyros were validated with sequence data on the genebank. The result showed that all accessions had relationships with 44 other Diospyros species globally. Here, we reported 10 new trnL-F intergenic spacer sequences of Malesian Diospyros species. A phylogenetic tree grouped 64 monophyletic Diospyros species into seven clades. The phylogenetic results supports the biogeographic hypothesis: the Malesian region, the Malesian-Caledonian Region, and Cosmopolite species in almost all bioregions.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Ainiyah RK, Wahyunindita V, Pratama WN, Pratiwi IA, Setiti E, Utami W, Hariyanto S. 2020. DNA barcoding?: Study of bananas (Musa spp.) Wild and cultivars group from East Java inferred by rbc L gene sequences. Ecol Environ Conserv. 26:S7–S13.
Alaklabi A, Arif IA, Bafeel SO, Alfarhan AH, Ahamed A, Thomas J, Bakir MA. 2014. Nucleotide based validation of the endangered plant Diospyros mespiliformis (Ebenaceae) by evaluating short sequence region of plastid rbcL gene. Plant Omics. 7(2):102–107.
APG IV. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc. 181(1):1–20. doi:10.1111/boj.12385.
Bakhuizen van den Brink R. 1933. Enumeration of malayan Ebenaceae. Gard Bull Singapore. VII:161–189.
Bakhuizen van den Brink R. 1936. Revisio ebenacearum Malayensium. Bull du Jard Bot Buitenzorg. serie 3(15):1–515.
Coissac E, Peter M. 2016. From barcodes to genomes?: extending the concept of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol. 25:1423–1428.
Costion C, Ford A, Cross H, Crayn D, Harrington M, Lowe A. 2011. Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras. PLoS One. 6(11):1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026841.
Duangjai S, Samuel R, Munzinger J, Forest F, Wallnöfer B, Barfuss MHJ, Fischer G, Chase MW. 2009. A multi-locus plastid phylogenetic analysis of the pantropical genus Diospyros (Ebenaceae), with an emphasis on the radiation and biogeographic origins of the New Caledonian endemic species. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 52(3):602–620. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.04.021.
Duangjai S, Wallnöfer B, Samuel R, Munzinger J, Chase MW. 2006. Generic delimitation and relationships in Ebenaceae sensu lato: Evidence from six plastid DNA regions. Am J Bot. 93(12):1808–1827. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.12.1808.
Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(5):1792–1797. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340.
Falsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA, U.S.A: Sinauer Associates Inc.
Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution (N Y). 39(4):783–791. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x.
Fu J, Liu H, Hu J, Liang Y, Liang J, Wuyun T, Tan X. 2016. Five complete chloroplast genome sequences from Diospyros?: genome organization and comparative analysis. PLoS One.:1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159566.
GBIF. 2019. GBIF backbone taxonomy. GBIF Backbone Taxon.. doi:https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei.
Guan C, Chachar S, Zhang P, Hu C, Wang R, Yang Y. 2020. Inter- and intra-specific genetic diversity in diospyros using SCoT and IRAP markers. Hortic Plant J. 6(March):84–93. doi:10.1016/j.hpj.2019.12.005.
Guan C, Liu S, Wang M, Ji H, Ruan X, Wang R, Yang Y. 2019. Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals genetic divergence and domestication genes in Diospyros. BMC Plant Biol. 19(1):1–14. doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1839-2.
Hall T. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid Sym. 41:95–98.
Hapsari L, Azrianingsih R, Arumingtyas EL. 2018. Genetic variability and relationship of banana cultivars (Musa l.) from East Java, Indonesia based on the internal transcribed spacer region nrdna sequences. J Trop Biol Conserv. 15(1):101–120.
Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol. 54(5):852–859. doi:10.1080/10635150500354886.
Hiern WP. 1873. A monograph of Ebenaceae. Trans Cambridge Philos Soc. 12:27–300.
Howlader MSI, Rahman Md. Mofizur, Khalipha ABR, Ahmed F, Rahman Md. Mustafizur. 2012. Antioxidant and antidiarhoeal of Diospyros blancoi. Int J Pharmacol. 8(5):403–409.
IUCN. 2019. The IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org.
Jessup LW. 2014. A taxonomic revision of Diospyros L. (Ebenaceae) in Australia. Austrobaileya. 9(2):155–197. doi:10.2307/43869000.
Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. 2005. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(23):8369–8374. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503123102.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 35(6):1547–1549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096.
Li W, Liu Y, Yang Y, Xie X, Lu Y, Yang Z, Jin X, Dong W, Suo Z. 2018. Interspecific chloroplast genome sequence diversity and genomic resources in Diospyros. BMC Plant Biol. 18(1):210. doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1421-3.
Li X, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang Y, Chen S. 2015. Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 90(1):157–166. doi:10.1111/brv.12104.
Mallavadhani U V., Panda AK, Rao YR. 1998. Pharmacology and chemotaxonomy of Diospyros. Phytochemistry. 49(4):901–951. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(97)01020-0.
Nei M, Kumar S. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ng FS. 1978. Ebenaceae. in: Ng, F.S.P. (Ed.), tree flora of malaya. London: Longman.
Ng FS. 2001. An overview of Diospyros of Borneo. Flora Malesiana Bull. 12:396–397.
Rauf A, Uddin G, Patel S, Khan A, Halim SA, Bawazeer S, Ahmad K, Muhammad N, Mubarak MS. 2017. Diospyros, an under-utilized, multi-purpose plant genus: a review. Biomed Pharmacother. 91:714–730. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.05.012.
Rombe Y, Raharjo R. 1982. Potensi dan Penyebaran Jenis Kayu Kurang Dikenal (Lesser Known Species) Eboni. Buku II. Bogor: Direktorat Bina Program Kehutanan.
Samuel R, Turner B, Duangjai S, Munzinger J, Paun O, Barfuss MHJ, Chase MW. 2019. Systematics and evolution of the Old World Ebenaceae , a review with emphasis on the large genus Diospyros and its radiation in New Caledonia. Bot J Linn Soc. 189:99–114.
Singh V. 2005. Monograph on Indian Diospyros L. (persimmon, ebony) Ebenaceae. Kolkata, India: Botanical Survey of India.
Slobodian V, Pastana MN de L. 2020. Monophyletic. Di dalam: Vonk J, Shackelford T, editor. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Cham: Springer International Publishing. hlm. 1–6.
Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2003. Applying the bootstrap in phylogeny reconstruction. Stat Sci. 18(2):256–267. doi:10.1214/ss/1063994980.
Stuessy TF. 2009. Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data. Ed ke-2 Volume ke-54. New York: Columbia University Press.
Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J, Biologie L De, Fourier UJ. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol. 17(ii):1105–1109. doi:Doi 10.1007/Bf00037152.
Tang D, Hu Y, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Luo Z. 2014. Discriminant analysis of “Jinzaoshi” from persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.; Ebenaceae): A comparative study conducted based on morphological as well as ITS and matK sequence analyses. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 168:168–174. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2014.01.033.
Tang D, Zhang Q, Xu L, Guo D, Luo Z. 2019. Number of Species and Geographical Distribution of Diospyros L. (Ebenaceae) in China. Hortic Plant J. 5(2):59–69. doi:10.1016/j.hpj.2018.10.003.
Techen N, Parveen I, Pan Z, Khan IA. 2014. DNA barcoding of medicinal plant material for identification. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 25(2014):103–110. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.010.
Turner B, Munzinger J, Duangjai S, Temsch EM, Stockenhuber R, Barfuss MHJ, Chase MW, Samuel R. 2013. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Molecular phylogenetics of New Caledonian Diospyros (Ebenaceae) using plastid and nuclear markers q. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(3):740–763. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.002.
Turner B, Paun O. 2016. Sequencing of whole plastid genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA of Diospyros species ( Ebenaceae ) endemic to New Caledonia?: many species , little divergence. Ann Bot. 117:1175–1185. doi:10.1093/aob/mcw060.
Vijayan K, Tsou CH. 2010. DNA barcoding in plants: taxonomy in a new perspective. Curr Sci. 99(11):1530–1541.
Wallnöfer B. 2001a. The biology and systematics of Ebenaceae: a review. Ann des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien Ser B für Bot und Zool. 103 B:485–512.
Wallnöfer B. 2001b. The biology and systematics of Ebenaceae: a review. Ann des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien Ser B für Bot und Zool. 103 B(January 2001):485–512.
Wanda IF, Peniwidiyanti, Oksari AA. 2019. Ex situ Conservation of Diospyros spp. (Ebenaceae) in the Bogor Botanic Gardens, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 308(1):1–8. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/308/1/012080.
White F. 1980. Notes on the Ebenaceae VIII. The African sections of Diospyros. Bull du Jard Bot Natl Belgique. 50(3):445–460.
White F. 1988. The taxonomy, ecology and chorology of African Ebenaceae. II. The non-Guineo-Congolian species of Diospyros (excluding sect. Royena). Bull Jard Bot Nation Belg. 58:325–448.
Yang Y, Yang T, Jing Z. 2015. Genetic diversity and taxonomic studies of date plum (Diospyros lotus L.) using morphological traits and SCoT markers. Biochem Syst Ecol. 61:253–259. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.008.
Zhang Y, Yang Y, Guo J, Hu C, Zhu R. 2016. Taxonomic status of Deyangshi based on chromosome number and SRAP markers. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 207:57–64. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.05.006.