Rice cultivar selection in an agroforestry system through GGE-biplot and EBLUP

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

TAUFAN ALAM
PRIYONO SURYANTO
SUPRIYANTA
PANJISAKTI BASUNANDA
RANI AGUSTINA WULANDARI
DODY KASTONO
MUHAMMAD HABIB WIDYAWAN
NURMANSYAH
TARYONO

Abstract

Abstract. Alam T, Suryanto P, Supriyanta, Basunanda P, Wulandari RA, Kastono D, Widyawan MH, Nurmansyah, Taryono. 2021. Rice cultivar selection in an agroforestry system through GGE-biplot and EBLUP. Biodiversitas 22: 4750-4757. Genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) causes differences in the productivity of rice cultivars in agroforestry systems. For this reason, the stability of rice cultivars is an important aspect that should be considered before a cultivar is recommended to farmers. Superior genotypes and ideal environments are commonly identified using two statistical models, namely, genotype–genotype-by-environment biplot (GGE-biplot) and empirical best linear unbiased prediction (EBLUP). In this study, 15 rice cultivars were evaluated in terms of their productivity and stability in three soil types (Lithic Haplusterts, Ustic Epiaquerts, and Vertic Haplustalfs) in an agroforestry system with kayu putih (Melaleuca cajuputi) in 2019 and 2020 at the Menggoran Forest Resort, Playen Forest Section, Yogyakarta Forest Management District, Indonesia. The cultivars were treated as random effects to select and obtain the EBLUP of the best cultivars in each soil type. The EBLUP revealed that Situ Patenggang showed the highest yields of 4.887 and 5.456 tons ha?1 in Lithic Haplusterts and Vertic Haplustalfs, respectively. GM 28 exhibited the highest yield of 6.492 tons ha?1 in Ustic Epiaquerts. Ciherang, GM 2, GM 8, GM 11, GM 28, Inpari 6 Jete, Inpari 33, IR-64, and Way Apo Buru were classified as stable and fairly stable cultivars, whereas the other cultivars were unstable. Therefore, rice cultivars with high yields in specific soil types should be selected.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Alam T, Kurniasih B, Suryanto P, Basunanda P, Supriyanta, Ambarwati E, Widyawan MH, Handayani S, Taryono. 2019a. Stability analysis for soybean in agroforestry system with kayu putih. SABRAO J Breed Genet 51(4): 405-418.
Alam T, Suryanto P, Handayani S, Kastono D, Kurniasih B. 2020. Optimizing application of biochar, compost and nitrogen fertilizer in soybean intercropping with kayu putih (Melaleuca cajuputi). Rev Bras Cienc Solo 44: e0200003.
Alam T, Suryanto P, Kastono D, Putra ETS, Handayani S, Widyawan MH, Muttaqin AS, Kurniasih B. 2021. Evaluation of interactions between biochar briquette with ammonium sulfate fertilizer for controlled nitrogen loss in soybean intercopping with Melaleuca cajuputi. Legume Res 4(3): 339-343.
Alam T, Suryanto P, Nurmalasari AI, Kurniasih B. 2019b. GGE-Biplot analysis for the suitability of soybean varieties in an agroforestry system based on kayu putih (Melaleuca cajuputi) stands. Caraka Tani: J Sustain Agric 34(2): 213-222.
Aristya VE, Trisyono YA, Mulyo JH, Taryono. 2021. Parcipatory varietal selection for promising rice lines. Sustain 13(6856): 1-18.
Bilgili AV, Kucuk C, van Es HM. 2017. Assessment of the quality of the Harran Plain soils under long-term cultivation. Environ Monit Assess 189:460.
Boettinger J, Chiaretti J, Ditzler C, Galbraith J, Kerschen K, Loerch C, McDanie P, McVey S, Monger C, Owens P, Ransom M, Scheffe K, Shaw J, Stolt M, Weindorf D. 2015. Illustrated Guide to Soil Taxonomy. Version 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Boy R, Indradewa D, Putra ETS, Kurniasih B. 2020. Drought-induced production of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants activity of four local upland rice cultivars in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21(6): 2555-2565.
Buntaran H, Piepho HP, Hagman J, Forkman J. 2019. A cross-validation of statistical models for zoned-based prediction in cultivar testing. Crop Sci 59: 1544-1553.
Djaenudin D, Marwan H, Subagjo H, Hidayat A. 2011. Technical Instructions Land Evaluation for Agricultural Commodities. Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia.
Djidonou D, Leskovar DI, Joshi M, Jifon J, Avila CA, Masabni J, Wallace RW, Crosby K. 2020. Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas. Sci Rep 10: 13535.
Eberhart SA, Russell WA. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6: 36-40.
European Union. 2012. Sustainable Agriculture for the Future We Want. International Cooperation and Development, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
FAO. 2019. World Food and Agriculture Statistical Pocketbook 2019. http://www.fao.org/3/ca6463en/ca6463en.pdf.
Farshadfar E, Hassan Z, Reza M. 2013. Evaluation of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes using GGE-Biplot. Ann Bio Res 2: 282-292.
Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14: 742-754.
Forkman J, Piepho HP. 2013. Performance of empirical BLUP and Bayesian prediction in small randomized complete block experiments. J Agric Sci 151: 381-395.
Gerrano AS, van Rensburg WSJ, Mathew I, Shayanowako AIT, Bairu MW, Venter SL, Swart W, Mofokeng A, Mellem J, Labuschagne M. 2020. Genotype and genotype 3environment interaction effectson the grain yield performance of cowpea genotypesin dryland farming system in South Africa. Euphytica 216(5).
Giller KE, Tittonell P, Rufino MC, van Wijk MT, Zingore S, Mapfumo P, Adjeinsiah S, Herrero M, Chikowo R, Corbeels M, Rowe EC, Baijukya F, Mwijage A, Smith J, Yeboah E, van der Burg WJ, Sanogo OM, Misiko M, de Ridder N, Karanja S, Kaizzi C, K’ungu J, Mwale M, Nwaga D, Pacini C, Vanlauwe B. 2011. Communicating complexity; integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming system to support innovation and development. Agric Syst 104(2): 191-203.
Goedhart PW, Thissen JTNM. 2016. Biometris GenStat Procedure Library Manual 18th Edition. Wageningen University and Research Center, NL.
Kaya Y, Akcura M, Taner S. 2006. GGE-Biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials in bread wheat. Turkish J Agric For 30: 325-337.
Klee HJ, Tieman DM. 2013. Genetic challenges of flavor improvement in tomato. Trends in Genet 29(4): 257-267.
Kleinknecht K, Möhring J, Singh KP, Zaidi PH, Atlin GN, Piepho HP. 2013. Comparison of the performance of BLUE and BLUP for zoned Indian maize data. Crop Sci 53: 1384-1391.
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. 2006. SAS® for mixed models. 2nd Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
Mulyani A, Nursyamsi D, Syakir M. 2017. Strategi pemanfaatan sumberdaya lahan untuk pencapaian swasembada beras berkelanjutan. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan 11(1): 11-22. [Indonesian]
Piepho HP, Möhring J. 2005. Best linear unbiased prediction for subdivided target regions. Crop Sci 45: 1151-1159.
Piepho HP, Nazir MF, Qamar M, Rattu AUR, Din RU, Hussain M, Ahmad G, Subhan FE, Ahmad J, Abdullah, Laghari KB, Vistro IA, Kakar MS, Sial MA, Imtiaz M. 2016. Stability analysis for a countrywide series of wheat trials in Pakistan. Crop Sci 56: 2465-2475.
Przystalski M, Thiemt E, Rolland B, Ericson L, Osman A, Ostergard H, Levy L, Wolfe M, Büchse A, Piepho HP, Krajewski P. 2008. Comparing the performance of cereal varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries. Euphytica 163: 417-433.
SAS Institute. 2013. SAS System for Windows 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc., North Carolina, USA.
Shukla GK. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.
Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R. 2005. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials; An overview of current mixed model approaches. J Agric Sci 143: 449-462.
Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Key to soil taxonomy version 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Statistics Indonesia. 2020. The harvested area and rice production in Indonesia 2019. Statistics Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2020/02/04/1752/luas-panen-dan-produksi-padi-pada-tahun-2019-mengalami-penurunan-dibandingkan-tahun-2018-masing-masing-sebesar-6-15-dan-7-76-persen.html.
Suryanto P, Kurniasih B, Faridah E, Nurjanto HH, Rogomulyo R, Handayani S, Kastono D, Muttaqin AS, Alam T. 2020a. Influence of furrow with organic material and Chromolaena odorata compost on upland rice productivity in an agroforestry system with Melaleuca cajuputi. Biodiversitas 21: 780-791.
Suryanto P, Taryono, Supriyanta, Kastono D, Putra ETS, Widyawan MH, Alam T. 2020b. Assessment of soil quality parameters and yield of rice cultivars in Melaleuca cajuputi agroforestry system. Biodiversitas 21: 3463-3470.
Suryanto P, Tohari, Putra ETS, Alam T. 2017. Minimum soil quality determinant for rice and ?kayu putih’ yield under hilly areas. J Agron 16: 115-123.
Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL. 2007. GGE-biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47: 643-655.
Yan W. 2001. GGE Biplot a windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron J 93(5): 1111-1118.
Yan W, Kang MS. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis; A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. 1st Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega environment investigation based on GGE Biplot. Crop Sci 40(3): 507-605.
Zaini Z, Abdurrahman S, Widiarta N, Wardana P, Setyorini D, Kartaatmadja S, Yamin M. 2016. Pedoman umum ptt padi sawah. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta. www.pangan.litbang.pertanian.go.id/files/pedumpajale/pttpadisawah.pdf.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>