Lesser spiny eel (Macrognathus aculeatus) feeding preferences in the Progo River, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

DJUMANTO

Abstract

Abstract. Djumanto. 2023. Lesser spiny eel (Macrognathus aculeatus) feeding preferences in the Progo River, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Intl J Bonorowo Wetlands 13: 36-42. Lesser spiny eel (Macrognathus aculeatus Bloch, 1786) is a highly valued fish species in the Progo River, Yogyakarta, due to its delectable taste, high nutritional value, and attractive aquarium filler. Therefore, this study aims to identify the dietary preferences of M. aculeatus collected between September 2020 and March 2021. Each fish was measured for individual length and weight, followed by an abdomen examination and digestive tract extraction. The intestinal length was also measured, and the digestive tract contents were classified based on the type and volume. Other parameters examined included relative gut length, the proportion of each kind of feed, the index of the largest portion, and the trophic level. The results showed that the ratio of gut length to total length ranged between 0.51 and 0.67, indicating that M. aculeatus were carnivorous. Their diet's six categories of organisms included crustaceans, annelids, insects, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and detritus. Female M. aculeatus was found to primarily consume shrimp (77.88%), followed by additional detritus feed (19.53%) and complementary feed (3%). Meanwhile, the males consumed 99.04% shrimp as their primary diet, and the remaining 0.9% were complementary. The feed niche area for female and male M. aculeatus was 0.137 and 0.005, respectively, indicating a minimal diet selection. Based on the results, the larger the fish, the more limited the feed options available. That indicates domestication and reintroduction should be made to preserve genetic diversity through food formulation and spawning from natural stocks.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Abujam SS, Shah RK, Singh SJ, Biswas SP. 2013. Food and feeding habit of spiny eel Mastacembelus aral (Bloch and Schneider) from upper assam. J FisheriesScience.com 7 (4): 360-373. DOI: 10.3153/jfscom.2013040.
Alam A, Gopinath V, Jha DN, Joshi KD, Kumar J, Das SCS, Thakur R, Gupta M, Das BK. 2020. Food and feeding biology of commercially important freshwater eel, Mastacembelus armatus (LACEPÈDE, 1800) from the Ganga River, India. J Oceanogr Fish 11 (4): 69-73. DOI: 10.19080/OFOAJ.2020.11.555819.
Biswas SP. 1993. Manual of Method in Fish Biology. South Asian Publishers Pvt Ltd, New Dehli.
Blaber SJM. 2001. Tropical estuarine fishes—Ecology, exploitation and conservation. Copeia 2001 (3): 880-883. DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0880:]2.0.CO;2.
Craig JK, Crowder LB. 2002. Factors influencing habitat selection in fishes with a review of marsh ecosystems. In Weinstein MP, Kreeger DA (eds). Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47534-0_12.
Djumanto, Devi MIP, Setyobudi E. 2013. Ichthyofauna distribution in downstream region of Opak River, Yogyakarta. J Iktiologi Indonesia 13 (2): 97-108. DOI: 10.32491/jii.v13i2.97.
Froese R, Pauly D. 2023. Editors. FishBase. World Wide Web Electronic publication.www.fishbase.org.
Gupta S. 2016. Feeding and reproductive biology of Mastacembelus pancalus (Hamilton, 1822), an indigenous fish species of Indian subcontinent: A review. Intl J Res Fish Aquac 6 (1): 8-12.
Herawati T, Adiwiguna I, Yustiati A, Rostini I, Setyobudi RH, Juahir H, Sahidin A. 2021. Rainy season's fish diversity upstream and downstream Jatigede Reservoir of Cimanuk River, West Java, Indonesia. Sarhad J Agric 37: 25-34. DOI: 10.17582/journal.sja/2021/37.s1.25.34.
Khaing MM, Khaing KYM. 2020. Food and feeding habits of some freshwater fishes from Ayeyarwady River, Mandalay District, Myanmar. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 416: 1-18. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/416/1/012005.
Nakazawa T. 2020. Species interaction: Revisiting its terminology and concept. Ecol Res 35: 1106-1113. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1703.12164.
Nurdawati S, Yuliani W. 2009. Food habit of fire eel, Mastacembelus erythrotaenia Bleeker 1850 in Musi River. J Iktiologi Indonesia 9 (2): 129-138. DOI: 10.32491/jii.v9i2.185.
Ohee HL, Sujarta P, Surbakti SB, Barclay H. 2018. Rapid expansion and biodiversity impacts of the red devil cichlid (Amphilophus labiatus, Günther 1864) in Lake Sentani, Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 19 (6): 2096-2103. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d190615.
Pavlov DS, Kasumyan AO. 2002. Feeding diversity in Fishes: Trophic Classification of Fish. J Ichthyol 42: S137-S159.
Pethiyagoda R, Silva A, Maduwage K, Kariyawasam L. 2008. The Sri Lanka spiny eel, Mastacembelus pentophthalamos (Teleostei: Mastacembelidae), and its enigmatic decline. Zootaxa 1931 (1): 37-48. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1931.1.3.
Serajuddin M, Ali R. 2005. Food and feeding habits of striped spiny eel, Mastacembelus pancalus (Hamilton). Indian J Fish 52 (1): 81-86.
Serajuddin M, Khan AA, Mustafa S. 1998. Food and feeding habits of the spiny eel, Mastacembelus armatus (Hamilton). Asian Fish Sci 11 (1): 271-278. DOI: 10.33997/j.afs.1998.11.3-4.010.
Stenberg M, Persson A. 2005. The effects of spatial food distribution and group size on foraging behaviour in a benthic fish. Behav Process 70 (1): 41-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.04.003.
Suresh VR, Biswas BK, Vinci GK, Mitra K, Mukherjee A. 2006. Biology and fishery of barred spiny eel, Mastacembelus pancalus Hamilton. Acta Ichthyol Et Piscatoria 36 (1): 31-37. DOI: 10.3750/AIP2006.36.1.05.
Uthayakumar V, Sreedevi PR, Senthilkumar D, Munirasu S, Kiruba K, Ramasubramanian V. 2013. Impact of seasonal variation and feeding on reproductive behavior of fresh water spiny eel Mastacembelus armatus from Cauvery River. Asian Pac J Reprod 2 (3): 189-195. DOI: 10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60145-1.
Verma ASK, Alim A. 2013. The role of corpuscles of stannius during ovarian cycle in female Mastacembelus armatus. J Indian Streams Res 3 (9): 1-6. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101439.
Volkoff H, Peter RE. 2006. Feeding behavior of fish and its control. Zebrafish 3 (2): 131-140. DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2006.3.131.