Effects of climate-change variability on livestock production and coping strategies in Maikona, Marsabit County, Kenya

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

MOLU WATO
MICHAEL K. KOECH
JAMES N. MARAGA

Abstract

Abstract. Wato M, Koech MK, Maraga JN. 2022. Effects of climate-change variability on livestock production and coping strategies in Maikona, Marsabit County, Kenya. Intl J Trop Drylands 6: 90-102. Climate change is viewed as one of humanity's greatest challenges. This study sought to investigate the coping mechanisms pastoral communities have employed in Maikona Location (Marsabit County, Kenya) and their sustainability. The study employed quantitative and qualitative methods, targeting 145 respondents, including 127 household respondents, 14 Women and Youth group members in FGDs, and 4 technical/NGO representatives. Questionnaires, FGDs, and key informant checklists were the main tools. Data were analyzed both inferentially and descriptively. The study envisioned would give vital information to policy-makers and pastoral development stakeholders on the actual impacts facing the pastoralists and the existing and appropriate coping mechanisms while guiding the interventions and policy options. The study found that there had been real and perceived changes in temperature and rainfall patterns. Field inquiries indicated rainfall patterns significantly changed (94%) between 1980 and 2010, as well as a significantly declining trend of the data from the metrological department. These changes were established to negatively impact livestock production and the livelihood of the community in the study area. The local community was found to seek relief food, buy food on credit and sell livestock assets as common coping strategies. The sustainability of those strategies, however, is in immense doubt since most of the respondents were not even sure of their longevity, while others admitted they might not use them for long. Moreover, most (84%) of the respondents could not tell the consequences of their strategies on the environment. The external supports provided to the communities were largely in response to emergencies and were not viewed as sustainable in the long term. The study recommended constantly sharing rainfall data from the metrological department with the pastoralists to understand the dynamics of rainfall and temperature variations on livestock production and possible coping strategies customized for their situation and advise them on sustainability. The study further recommended the need for long-term support like establishing a livestock market, supporting education through sponsorship, and adopting policies that support mobility instead of sedentarization of the communities.

2017-01-01

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Climate-Data.org. 2015. Climate: Maikona. http://www.en.climatedata.org/location/103875/. Accessed on 15th February 2015.
Davidson OK. 2003. The development and climate nexus: The case of sub-Saharan Africa. Climate Policy 3S1: S97-S113. DOI: 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.007.
DFID. 2009. Pastoralism and Climate Change, Pastoral Information Note 5. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, United Kingdom, .[Unpublished]
IFPRI. 2009. Climate Change Impact on Agriculture and Costs of Adaptation: Food Policy. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
IPCC. 2007. Africa, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
KARI. 2004. Transformation of Agricultural Research in Africa: Lessons from Kenya. Michigan State University Press, Michigan, USA.
Ketiem PK, Njunie MN, Wafula BW. 2009. Emerging Responses to Climate Change Adaptation Strategies in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Coastal Kenya. KARI, Kenya.
King JM, Parsons DJ, Turnpenny JR, Nyangaga J, Bakari P, Wathes CM. 2006. Modelling energy metabolism of Friesians in Kenya smallholdings shows how heat stress and energy deficit constrain milk yield and cow replacement rate. Anim Sci 82: 705-716. DOI: 10.1079/ASC200689.
Morton J. 2010. Pastoralism Information Note 5: Pastoralism and Climate Change. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, United Kingdom.
Mugenda OM, Mugenda AG. 2003. Research Methods-Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. ACTS, Nairobi, Kenya.
O'Brien KL, Leichenko RM. 2000. Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob Environ Change 10: 221-232. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2.
OECD 2001. OECD Annual Report 2001. OECD Secretary-General's Report to Ministers.
Srivastava AK, Rai MK. 2012. Review: Sugarcane production: Impact of climate change and its mitigation 13: 214-227. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d130408.
Thornton PK, van de Steer J, Notenbaert A, Herrero M. 2009. The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries; A review. J Agric Syst 101: 113-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002.
Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH. 1998. The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Witsenburg KM, Roba AW. 2004. Surviving Pastoral Decline: Pastoral Sedentarisation, Natural Resource Management and Livelihood Diversification in Marsabit District, Northern Kenya, [PhD Thesis] Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWFN). 2006. Climate Change Impact on East Africa: A Review of Scientific Literature. WWF, Switzerland.